Recent data from Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection identifies a shift in international travel preferences for 2026, with a heightened priority on personal security and infrastructure reliability. The research highlights cities that combine low crime rates with dependable public transportation and robust tourism systems.

European Safety Leaders

Reykjavik has emerged as a primary hub for safety-conscious travelers, cited for its accessible public spaces and reliable visitor services. Copenhagen and Zurich follow closely, both recognized for high-functioning hospitality infrastructure and well-maintained urban environments.

While major hubs like London, Paris, Barcelona, Lisbon, Dublin, Venice, and Amsterdam maintain strong appeal due to their cultural density, the report notes a divergence between general safety and petty crime. Opportunistic theft and tourist scams remain prevalent in these high-traffic zones.

Asia-Pacific Stability

The Asia-Pacific region continues to dominate safety assessments. Tokyo, Seoul, Singapore, and Sydney are highlighted as top-tier destinations.

  • Tokyo: Noted for its organized public spaces and extensive railway network.
  • Seoul: Recognized for the integration of modern transport and hospitality.
  • Singapore: Cited for a highly regulated urban environment and efficiency.
  • Sydney: Valued for developed tourism services and coastal infrastructure.

North American and Niche Markets

In North America, Toronto, Honolulu, and San Francisco are listed as relatively safe options. However, the data suggests a neighborhood-specific approach to safety in San Francisco, where property crime remains a factor.

Smaller, high-end or boutique destinations are also gaining traction. Auckland, Valletta, and Monte Carlo are increasingly viewed as viable alternatives to mega-cities for those seeking luxury and security.

High-Risk Zones

The report contrasts these safe havens with cities facing severe security crises. Yangon, Karachi, and Caracas are flagged for significant risks. Specifically, Myanmar remains under the highest US travel advisory level due to armed conflict, landmines, and political unrest. Other cities requiring rigorous planning include Lagos, Manila, Dhaka, Bogotá, Cairo, Mexico City, and Quito.

Key Facts Breakdown

  • Top Safety Drivers: Low crime, reliable transit, and strong tourism infrastructure.
  • Top-Tier Cities: Reykjavik, Copenhagen, Zurich, Tokyo, Singapore, Seoul, and Sydney.
  • High-Risk Warning: Yangon (Myanmar) remains under the highest US travel advisory.
  • Regional Trends: Asia-Pacific remains the most consistently safe region for urban travel.
  • Cautionary Zones: Pickpocketing remains a primary concern in London, Barcelona, and Amsterdam.

Why This Matters

From a logistical perspective, this data indicates that "safety" is no longer just about the absence of crime; it is now tied to infrastructure reliability. For the 2026 traveler, a city's safety rating is heavily influenced by how efficiently a tourist can navigate the city via public transport without vulnerability.

Our analysis suggests a growing trend toward "predictable travel." Travelers are bypassing traditional hubs for cities like Reykjavik or Singapore where the environment is more regulated. For travel agents and planners, this means a shift in itinerary design: prioritizing destinations where the "friction" of travel—such as navigating unsafe neighborhoods or unreliable transit—is minimized.

Industry Outlook

Expect a surge in booking volumes for "Tier 1" safety cities in 2026, potentially leading to over-tourism in hubs like Copenhagen and Zurich. We anticipate that mid-sized cities will attempt to market their "safety credentials" as a primary competitive advantage to lure travelers away from congested capitals. Additionally, the stark contrast in safety levels will likely lead to higher travel insurance premiums for trips involving the flagged high-risk urban centers in Africa and Asia.

Recommended Read: