The Reason Trump Demands a 100% Tariff on Mexican-Made Automobiles

Anjali Jain
Earlier this week, Donald Trump suggested that he would impose a 100 percent tariff on select automobiles manufactured

Donald Trump’s suggestion earlier this week that he would impose a 100 percent tariff on select Mexican-made automobiles caused a minor uproar in the automotive industry.
Upon further investigation, it appears that Trump is exclusively directing his criticism towards Chinese vehicles that are produced to the south of the frontier. In Dayton, Ohio, the statement was delivered at the “Buckeye Values PAC” rally. It follows the announcement by Chinese automaker BYD that it intends to construct a manufacturing facility in Mexico. While it is anticipated that the majority of the resulting vehicles will be electric, BYD has stated that it has no plans to sell them in the United States.

Amidst an interminable accumulation of news articles that falsely accused Trump of advocating for a “bloodbath” in the event of his defeat in the 2024 election, this audacious proposition was buried. Nevertheless, it seemed that the aforementioned remark was in fact referring to the automotive sector. It appears that the former president employed the phrase to underscore his claim that American automakers would be economically battered by their rivals as a result of the Biden EV drive and rising competition from China. Since 2020, he has maintained this stance, contending that an all-electric lineup would be detrimental to the domestic automotive industry if it incessantly pursued electrification. He stated that the same would hold true should the United States disregard the significant economic power that China possesses.

Trump had previously made an effort to repeal emissions regulations implemented during the Obama administration. Subsequently, he issued a warning that these regulations were impeding the progress of producing affordable vehicles that the American public truly desired to purchase. Executive orders issued within the first month of Biden’s presidency, however, reversed any regulatory changes he implemented during his presidency.

We can speculate as to why Trump would propose tariffs in such an aggressive manner, but trade with China has consistently been a primary objective of his administration. Even during his presidency, the U.S. trade deficit decreased, primarily as a result of his utilization of tariffs as a negotiating strategy. However, imposing a one hundred percent tariff on vehicles manufactured abroad will not lead to improved product quality or more affordable options for the general public, both of which he previously stated were essential.
It is conceivable that he is attempting to gain the favor of the automotive union. The leadership of the UAW is manifestly in support of Joe Biden and the DNC.

- Advertisement -

President Shawn Fain even attended the State of the Union address while raising his fist in an attempt to appear as an ally of the administration. The Democratic Party and the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) have historically supported the union leadership. The union members of today, however, are not, so long as they represent labor-intensive sectors.

Since the 1970s, there has been a substantial decline in the quantity of union halls dedicated to steelworkers and automotive professionals. Furthermore, there appears to be a diminished propensity among employees to blindly adhere to leadership. Decades of job offshoring to other nations have instilled a profound sense of disillusionment among the automotive industry, according to my personal conversations with a large number of workers. Another concern that has arisen is union corruption, as the UAW was notorious for harboring unscrupulous individuals prior to its recent leadership transition.

The fact that Fain negotiated a lucrative contract with manufacturers helped restore at least some confidence in the UAW. Nonetheless, those lamenting the decline of American labor would benefit from Trump’s implication that he could render imported automobiles more difficult to operate than they are worth. Indeed, during his Ohio speech, he implied that the ongoing domestic policies would persistently undermine labor unions. He also recognized the contrasting nature of leadership and union members, stating that he was certain a significant number of workers would still support him despite the top leadership remaining allied with the Democrats.

“The treatment of the United Auto Workers by their own members is abhorrent.” During his speech, Trump stated, “They want to do this all-electric nonsense where the cars don’t travel very far, are overpriced, and are all made in China.” “Moreover, it is unlikely that the leader of the United Auto Workers has ever before shook hands with a Republican.” They are destroying—you know, Mexico has seized 34% of American automobile manufacturing over the course of thirty years. Reflect upon it. It was delivered to Mexico.

China is currently constructing two enormous facilities in Mexico where they intend to manufacture automobiles with the intention of reselling them into the United States duty-free at the border.I am friendly with you, President Xi, if you are paying attention. However, he comprehends my approach to dealing. Those enormous automobile assembly facilities that you are currently constructing in Mexico with the belief that you will obtain that without employing Americans and sell the vehicles to us— Not the case. If elected, we will impose a 100 percent tariff on each and every automobile that crosses our border; you will not be permitted to sell those automobiles. “The nation as a whole will be in a bloodbath if I am not elected.” “That is to be the least of it; the entire nation will be in a bloodbath if I am not elected.”

- Advertisement -

If all of your preferred automobiles are domestically produced and your family’s finances are reliant on domestic automotive manufacturing, a substantial tariff on imports does not present a significant disadvantage. However, your author would undoubtedly contend that such a production would contradict Trump’s prior declarations about maximizing consumer options and could render one of the automobiles you were previously considering unattainable if it ever expanded beyond China.

It is common knowledge that Trump tends to initiate discussions with sensationalized declarations that embody idealized aspirations. Those enormous tariffs will likely be reduced to a more manageable level if Donald Trump wins the presidency. However, this does not undermine the potential negative consequences of their execution or the ability for them to achieve their intended outcome.

It is possible that the underlying concern is not so much the possibility of Trump impeding Chinese imports, but rather the establishment of an undesirable precedent with this plan. The author is indifferent to the fact that he will never have the chance to operate one of the vehicles in BYD’s current lineup. If, however, those tariffs were to be applied to additional brands, presuming they were perceived as the next enormous threat, he might have a different opinion. It would be equally inconsistent for me to criticize Biden’s expansive electric vehicle policies as market manipulation while ignoring comparable proposals put forth by the administration’s principal political opponent. While I personally hold a negative view of the Chicken Tax and contemporary safety regulations, you might discover that you are more inclined to comply with industrial regulations.

- Advertisement -

Furthermore, the manner in which the government could prohibit Chinese automobiles manufactured in Mexico while avoiding repercussions for well-established U.S. brands that also produce there remains ambiguous. It could be argued that the 100 percent import tax violates the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which was established by Trump. There are numerous unanswered concerns regarding the practical implementation of a ban on entrance from China, which would not impede the overall progress of the industry. Keeping an eye on this will be valuable as the election approaches.

Share This Article
Hello, I'm Anjali Jain, a passionate writer navigating the dynamic realms of entertainment, politics, and technology. My blog serves as a digital canvas where I explore the intricate threads that weave together these diverse spheres, offering readers a comprehensive and engaging perspective. Entertainment Aficionado: As an avid consumer of all things entertainment, I delve into the worlds of movies, television, music, and more. Through my blog, I share insightful analyses, reviews, and behind-the-scenes glimpses into the ever-evolving landscape of pop culture. Political Explorer: I'm not one to shy away from the complexities of the political arena. From local issues to global affairs, my writings aim to unravel the intricacies of political events, fostering meaningful conversations about the societal impact of policy decisions. Tech Enthusiast: With an insatiable curiosity for technology, I keep my readers abreast of the latest innovations and trends in the tech world. My articles break down complex concepts, making technology accessible and exploring its profound influence on our daily lives. Narrative Architect: Through my writing, I craft narratives that bridge the gap between entertainment, politics, and technology. Each blog post is a journey, offering readers a thought-provoking exploration of the forces shaping our world. Join me in unraveling the stories that define our culture. Connect with me on Facebook, Instagram and X for real-time updates, discussions, and a shared passion for the fascinating intersection of entertainment, politics, and tech.
Leave a comment

Discover more from Kordinate.World

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading